Menu
Projections, form and season leaders.
updated 6h ago
Tap a team for full stats
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UCL Borussia Dortmund | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 13 | WWWWD |
| 2 | UCL FC Bayern München | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 10 | WDWW |
| 3 | UCL SC Freiburg | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 10 | WWWD |
| 4 | UCL Werder Bremen | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 8 | LWDWD |
| 5 | UEL FC Augsburg | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 7 | WWDL |
| 6 | Conf Bayer 04 Leverkusen | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 7 | LWDW |
| 7 | FSV Mainz 05 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 7 | DWLW |
| 8 | Elversberg | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 7 | WWLD |
| 9 | RB Leipzig | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 6 | WLWL |
| 10 | Eintracht Frankfurt | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 5 | DLWD |
| 11 | Schalke 04 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 5 | LDWD |
| 12 | Paderborn | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 | -2 | 4 | DLLW |
| 13 | FC Köln | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 4 | WLDL |
| 14 | TSG Hoffenheim | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 3 | LLWL |
| 15 | VfB Stuttgart | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 3 | LWLL |
| 16 | Relegation Hamburger SV | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 13 | -11 | 3 | LLLW |
| 17 | Relegation FC Union Berlin | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 17 | -13 | 1 | DLLL |
| 18 | Relegation Borussia Mönchengladbach | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 16 | -10 | 0 | LLLL |
Goals, and what is behind them. Games scored in separates the striker on five in five from the one with a hat-trick and two blanks, and non-penalty goals separates open play from the spot.
1

Patrik Schick


Bayer 04 Leverkusen · 30 · 4 apps · 261 mins
4
Games scored in
4
Goals
2

Younes Ebnoutalib


Eintracht Frankfurt · 23 · 4 apps · 281 mins
2
Games scored in
4
Goals
3

Michael Olise


FC Bayern München · 24 · 4 apps · 303 mins
2
Games scored in
4
Goals
4

Yuito Suzuki


SC Freiburg · 24 · 4 apps · 324 mins
2
Games scored in
4
Goals
5

Phillip Tietz


FSV Mainz 05 · 29 · 4 apps · 360 mins
3
Games scored in
4
Goals
6

Maurice Krattenmacher


Elversberg · 21 · 4 apps · 139 mins
2
Games scored in
3
Goals
7

Michael Gregoritsch


FC Augsburg · 32 · 4 apps · 293 mins
2
Games scored in
3
Goals
8

Harry Kane


FC Bayern München · 33 · 4 apps · 295 mins
2
Games scored in
3
Goals
9

Sheraldo Becker


FSV Mainz 05 · 31 · 4 apps · 286 mins
2
Games scored in
2
Goals
10

Marco Grüll


Werder Bremen · 28 · 4 apps · 355 mins
2
Games scored in
2
Goals
The table, the fixtures, the clean sheet board and both of these lists cost nothing and never will. An account just lets you follow your club and land on its page when you open the site.
Already have one? Sign in
Every fixture we cover, with the full distribution rather than a single pick. Days run in order; within a day, the clearest reads come first.
Showing the next three days. Create a free account for a week or a fortnight ahead.
8 of 26 fixtures
Early in the season, most reads here are low clarity teams haven't played enough matches for the model to be confident.
Today
6 fixtures
TSG Hoffenheim v Hamburger SV
1:30 PM
56%
TSG Hoffenheim
Over 2.5 68%
BTTS 65%
Moderate clarity · 37
RB Leipzig v Eintracht Frankfurt
4:30 PM
53%
RB Leipzig
Over 2.5 67%
BTTS 65%
Moderate clarity · 32
Paderborn v VfB Stuttgart
1:30 PM
43%
VfB Stuttgart
Over 2.5 65%
BTTS 66%
Low clarity · 6
FC Union Berlin v Elversberg
1:30 PM
42%
Elversberg
Over 2.5 71%
BTTS 70%
Low clarity · 4
FSV Mainz 05 v Bayer 04 Leverkusen
1:30 PM
· form rising
39%
FSV Mainz 05
Over 2.5 71%
BTTS 71%
Low clarity · 0
Tomorrow
2 fixtures
FC Köln v Borussia Mönchengladbach
1:30 PM
47%
FC Köln
Over 2.5 69%
BTTS 69%
Low clarity · 17
SC Freiburg v Schalke 04
3:30 PM
· form rising
51%
SC Freiburg
Over 2.5 61%
BTTS 61%
Low clarity · 16
CONFIDENT READS
Fixtures the model called at 60% or higher, last 30 days
100%
2 of 2 correct
League pulse
Goals per match
3.33
last 9 matches
Draws
33%
above 26% average
Model accuracy
50%
vs 33% at random · 368 scored
Avg clarity
19
9 fixtures ahead
On Paper
Research grade projections. Transparent tracking. No hype.
© 2026 On Paper Analytic. Informational research only.
Signal Clarity — 53
There's reasonable data behind this, but either the sample is still building or the outcomes sit fairly close together.
Clarity is not the chance of the result happening — that's the percentage. It's how much weight the read deserves.
0–29 low · 30–59 moderate · 60–100 high
Signal Clarity — 37
There's reasonable data behind this, but either the sample is still building or the outcomes sit fairly close together.
Clarity is not the chance of the result happening — that's the percentage. It's how much weight the read deserves.
0–29 low · 30–59 moderate · 60–100 high
Signal Clarity — 32
There's reasonable data behind this, but either the sample is still building or the outcomes sit fairly close together.
Clarity is not the chance of the result happening — that's the percentage. It's how much weight the read deserves.
0–29 low · 30–59 moderate · 60–100 high
Signal Clarity — 6
Thin data, a near coin-flip, or both. The projection is still our best estimate — it just isn't worth much weight.
Clarity is not the chance of the result happening — that's the percentage. It's how much weight the read deserves.
0–29 low · 30–59 moderate · 60–100 high
Signal Clarity — 4
Thin data, a near coin-flip, or both. The projection is still our best estimate — it just isn't worth much weight.
Clarity is not the chance of the result happening — that's the percentage. It's how much weight the read deserves.
0–29 low · 30–59 moderate · 60–100 high
Signal Clarity — 0
Thin data, a near coin-flip, or both. The projection is still our best estimate — it just isn't worth much weight.
Clarity is not the chance of the result happening — that's the percentage. It's how much weight the read deserves.
0–29 low · 30–59 moderate · 60–100 high
Signal Clarity — 17
Thin data, a near coin-flip, or both. The projection is still our best estimate — it just isn't worth much weight.
Clarity is not the chance of the result happening — that's the percentage. It's how much weight the read deserves.
0–29 low · 30–59 moderate · 60–100 high
Signal Clarity — 16
Thin data, a near coin-flip, or both. The projection is still our best estimate — it just isn't worth much weight.
Clarity is not the chance of the result happening — that's the percentage. It's how much weight the read deserves.
0–29 low · 30–59 moderate · 60–100 high