Menu
Projections, form and season leaders.
updated 6h ago
Tap a team for full stats
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | GD | Pts | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UCL Hajduk Split | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 16 | WWWWL |
| 2 | Conf Dinamo Zagreb | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 16 | WDWLW |
| 3 | Conf Osijek | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 17 | 11 | 6 | 16 | LWLWD |
| 4 | Varaždin | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 15 | LWDDD |
| 5 | Rijeka | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 14 | WDWDW |
| 6 | Istra 1961 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 9 | LDDWL |
| 7 | Lokomotiva Zagreb | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 7 | LLLDL |
| 8 | Slaven Koprivnica | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 16 | -9 | 7 | WLWLD |
| 9 | Rudeš | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 12 | 25 | -13 | 7 | LLLDW |
| 10 | Relegation Gorica | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 5 | DLDWL |
Every fixture we cover, with the full distribution rather than a single pick. Days run in order; within a day, the clearest reads come first.
Showing the next three days. Create a free account for a week or a fortnight ahead.
4 of 14 fixtures
Early in the season, most reads here are low clarity teams haven't played enough matches for the model to be confident.
Today
2 fixtures
Tomorrow
2 fixtures
CONFIDENT READS
Fixtures the model called at 60% or higher, last 30 days
100%
2 of 2 correct
League pulse
Goals per match
2.40
last 5 matches
Draws
20%
at or below 25% average
Model accuracy
48.8%
vs 33% at random · 160 scored
Avg clarity
27
5 fixtures ahead
On Paper
Research grade projections. Transparent tracking. No hype.
© 2026 On Paper Analytic. Informational research only.
Signal Clarity — 34
There's reasonable data behind this, but either the sample is still building or the outcomes sit fairly close together.
Clarity is not the chance of the result happening — that's the percentage. It's how much weight the read deserves.
0–29 low · 30–59 moderate · 60–100 high
Signal Clarity — 5
Thin data, a near coin-flip, or both. The projection is still our best estimate — it just isn't worth much weight.
Clarity is not the chance of the result happening — that's the percentage. It's how much weight the read deserves.
0–29 low · 30–59 moderate · 60–100 high
Signal Clarity — 40
There's reasonable data behind this, but either the sample is still building or the outcomes sit fairly close together.
Clarity is not the chance of the result happening — that's the percentage. It's how much weight the read deserves.
0–29 low · 30–59 moderate · 60–100 high
Signal Clarity — 18
Thin data, a near coin-flip, or both. The projection is still our best estimate — it just isn't worth much weight.
Clarity is not the chance of the result happening — that's the percentage. It's how much weight the read deserves.
0–29 low · 30–59 moderate · 60–100 high